From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xf86drm: fix build error by udev dependency
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:34:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55680858.8000801@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvgo51jZf+YtQUE8qCi0-F3kL_-ygjgcmnGZ3ocdOZtv8WH5g@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/28/2015 10:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 28 May 2015 at 00:56, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> The build error is introduced by commit fde496917682 ("Add device
>> enumeration interface (v4)") if don't enable udev. Can solve as check
>> UDEV dependency.
>>
>> CC libdrm_la-xf86drm.lo
>> xf86drm.c:66:21: fatal error: libudev.h: No such file or directory
>> #include "libudev.h"
>> ^
>> compilation terminated.
>> make[2]: *** [libdrm_la-xf86drm.lo] Error 1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> xf86drm.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c
>> index b5a174b..4a31019 100644
>> --- a/xf86drm.c
>> +++ b/xf86drm.c
>> @@ -63,7 +63,9 @@
>>
>> #include "xf86drm.h"
>> #include "libdrm_macros.h"
>> +#if defined(UDEV)
> The macro you're looking for (here and below) is #if HAVE_LIBUDEV.
>
I'm not sure it's right using HAVE_LIBUDEV instead of UDEV because
currently UDEV is used from .c file but HAVE_LIBUDEV is not.
>> #include "libudev.h"
>> +#endif
>>
>> #if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) || defined(__DragonFly__)
>> #define DRM_MAJOR 145
>> @@ -2819,6 +2821,7 @@ char *drmGetRenderDeviceNameFromFd(int fd)
>> return drmGetMinorNameForFD(fd, DRM_NODE_RENDER);
>> }
>>
>> +#if defined(UDEV)
>> /**
>> * Enumerate the GPU devices on the system
>> *
>> @@ -2917,3 +2920,4 @@ int drmGetPciDevices(drmPciDevicePtr devSet, uint16_t vendorId)
>>
>> return drmDevCount;
>> }
>> +#endif
> The above change will lead to a broken library as the symbol will be
> missing. Just returning -ENOSYS when libudev is missing sounds
> reasonable imho. Although I'm more inclined to reverting the patch,
> unless we get an actual user and an implementation that does not pull
> the dependency of libudev.
>
Sure, it's reasonable to use #if in function.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-29 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-28 0:56 [PATCH] xf86drm: fix build error by udev dependency Joonyoung Shim
2015-05-28 1:04 ` Deucher, Alexander
2015-05-28 8:53 ` Zhou, Jammy
2015-05-28 13:02 ` Emil Velikov
2015-05-29 6:34 ` Joonyoung Shim [this message]
2015-05-30 13:02 ` Emil Velikov
2015-06-01 2:52 ` Joonyoung Shim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55680858.8000801@samsung.com \
--to=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.