From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 29 May 2015 10:48:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.o-t.ch ([217.197.209.32]:46014 "EHLO mail.o-t.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27007528AbbE2IsvMx8ki (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 10:48:51 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (unknown [130.125.10.26]) (Authenticated sender: lf@o-t.ch) by mail.o-t.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 249B41801A4; Fri, 29 May 2015 10:48:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <556827FE.9080906@libres.ch> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 10:49:02 +0200 From: Laurent Fasnacht User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle , Laurent Fasnacht CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: ath79: fix build problem if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD is not set References: <556603C8.5010502@libres.ch> <20150528153808.GA7012@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20150528153808.GA7012@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 47722 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: l@libres.ch Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 28. 05. 15 17:38, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 07:50:00PM +0200, Laurent Fasnacht wrote: >> [...] > This patch is corrupt. Please check how you send out your patches. > The lines which I marked with XXX should be blank lines containing just > one space character. Instead the lines were removed and the space > inserted into the following line. Because this patch is trivial I > fix that manually but please sort our your patch submission process > for the future. Thank you very much. My apologies for the inconvenience, next time I'll do better. > Also note that adding two lines in most jurisdictions doesn't constitute > something copyrightable, adding a copyright notice or not. I fully agree. Laurent