From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7? Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:14:25 +0100 Message-ID: <55686631.7020606@citrix.com> References: <1432284841.10746.136.camel@citrix.com> <555EEFD8.8020306@citrix.com> <1432285699.10746.147.camel@citrix.com> <1432904091.15036.27.camel@citrix.com> <55688018020000780007F06C@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55688018020000780007F06C@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , Ian Campbell Cc: Paul Durrant , Ian Jackson , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 29.05.15 at 14:54, wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> If win7 doesn't shutdown given a power button request I'd be more >>> inclined to remove the setting in osstest for those flights and let >>> guest-stop go back to being never pass than to start making such changes >>> to the VM config which I think would probably break the preceding >>> suspend and migration tests (which aren't completely reliable, but are >>> far more so than this shutdown one). >> Does anyone have any ideas here or shall I propose: > Unless we have a way to make an adjustment inside the guest for the > power button to gain "shutdown" meaning, I think there's no alternative > to the change below. You can avoid advertising S3/S4 in the ACPI tables, which iirc causes the same alteration to happen. Hvmloader uses the platform/acpi_s{3,4} booleans to control whether the relevant SSDTs are exposed. ~Andrew