From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2A0B2E00988; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:21:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.223.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB23DE0086D for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iebgx4 with SMTP id gx4so70262697ieb.0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:21:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vZc77n/ykrPeBZNhXkPV+QThtwbzrjY31WXu9OKqHgc=; b=JrHXSqnlGjW2Uew6se5U0sptfffWHyC63p8YIQTaqtCkPaiqlLW4JmhMqldtpofbVT 5DowcIe0xf48jJ1oE84aGcPFlF4f7OHnjTX+lZ0d/RhoJ9C009Lwp17GxHzxRywQ9Z0s L5i+/fMGRp9sajFqnARgRFlbQJQkT1+15Y/Z4biBsZOuq0i1p2zCpaXUjrtne94i+ggL 32Ev25lw7F4PxXkgYO7qZuFl/4Q6dOo/kvdWaIxzZ6gyFdR7ebdNKVYn0w4AiWbW8R3+ 7nggW5E63zJBGmulFsXcr9t/FY3rqYLm50Og/xfPdNPbvsjz7xOuLr+6KkW528FzZaYE bwXQ== X-Received: by 10.42.238.14 with SMTP id kq14mr16890672icb.23.1432927268176; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g1sm4827056iog.4.2015.05.29.12.21.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2015 12:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5568BC20.7080703@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:21:04 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rifenbark, Scott M" , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" References: <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237988EF8590@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237988EF8590@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Cc: "Hart, Darren" , "Wold, Saul" Subject: Re: Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 19:21:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Scott, On 05/18/15 10:42, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > I have a section in the YP Linux Kernel Development Manual that talks about building out-of-tree-modules on the target - Interestingly enough, I was just reading through that document the other day. As soon as I saw a section titled "Building Out-Of-Tree Modules _On The Target_" I thought to myself "why would anyone be doing development on the target and not the host?" and skipped to the next section. If it were me, I'd just remove that section altogether. I'm of the opinion that doing development work on the target is wrong (if for no other reason than to prove your cross-development setup is working correctly), but that's just me. ;-)