From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 63CFFE00988; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:37:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.213.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180FDE0086D for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igbyr2 with SMTP id yr2so22272837igb.0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:37:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lySwjhwrkLf/oiOwPVueJa/IHYj8xDX9lgy+ZeTbBqI=; b=nM5y0H5Vw65h2gkbXrktGuC0mbM4sgXXID4rEjhE2NTuNsR0zl6jzl+EjzYQ//MrA5 KB1XfjA70RlvFHwtEbhPcOjk00aRS9QRQpdGCYw7DnmPfCv5zWUtOIyIlKZiVCrKyFIK EIKhBxGkJgsd84bHAl4ZYXiZvpyEzqmK5vBGD0AZXRByZskUdMoaTSUyNZnkI2k3pWt0 B7gisSZbZ1hLSP/Z0OCI/lkNG7XvBT3XMGdu2mPv6k9dd9WuTJwisH+JnTsQKJmyrkkD PT+sG4M0Abyuc4okD//J0hdm+ecmtEpX6aBz6WDItcmxlV+CMYzcFHYvTo232chXDxL3 lBng== X-Received: by 10.50.225.35 with SMTP id rh3mr5985619igc.29.1432928260715; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w124sm4028848iod.3.2015.05.29.12.37.38 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2015 12:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5568BFFE.6020303@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:37:34 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicholas Krause , "Rifenbark, Scott M" , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" References: <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237988EF8590@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <5568BC20.7080703@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "Hart, Darren" , "Wold, Saul" Subject: Re: Question on building out-of-tree modules on the target X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 19:37:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/29/15 15:28, Nicholas Krause wrote: > On May 29, 2015 3:21:04 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner wrote: >> If it were me, I'd just remove that section altogether. I'm of the >> opinion that doing development work on the target is wrong (if for no >> other reason than to prove your cross-development setup is working >> correctly), but that's just me. >> >> ;-) > Your assuming the target isn't powerful enough for compiling. What if it is? That's why I included that part in parenthesis :-) Many "embedded" devices are well powerful enough for compiling, but doing all your development on the host computer demonstrates your cross-development environment is properly configured for all development tasks.