From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Hunt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv6: Fix protocol resubmission Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:43:31 -0500 Message-ID: <5568DD83.8020600@akamai.com> References: <1432929886-14259-1-git-send-email-johunt@akamai.com> <5568CBCC.1080503@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com To: Sergei Shtylyov , davem@davemloft.net Return-path: Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com ([72.246.2.14]:41956 "EHLO prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756266AbbE2Vnd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 17:43:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5568CBCC.1080503@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/29/2015 03:27 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 05/29/2015 11:04 PM, Josh Hunt wrote: > >> I came across this problem while trying to use UDP encapsulation with >> IPv6. The >> change below fixes that, but it was not immediately apparent if there >> are any >> other protocols relying on this broken behavior. FWIW the behavior >> below now >> matches IPv4. > >> Josh > > Need "Signed-off-by:" line insted of this. > >> v2: Actually sets nexthdr so we can use it ;) > > Normally goes after ---, not before. > >> --- > >> UDP encapsulation is broken on IPv6 because it expects when it returns >> a negative >> value that the packet will be resubmitted to the stack with the >> handler corresponding >> to the return value. The check currently looks for return values > 0 >> and then resubmits. > >> This patch fixes that check and also moves the resubmit label to take >> advantage of >> the return code identifying the next protocol we want to process. > >> Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt >> --- >> net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 7 ++++--- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c >> index f2e464e..e16c289 100644 >> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c >> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c > [...] >> @@ -246,9 +246,10 @@ resubmit: >> goto discard; >> >> ret = ipprot->handler(skb); >> - if (ret > 0) >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + nexthdr = -ret; >> goto resubmit; >> - else if (ret == 0) >> + } else if (ret == 0) >> IP6_INC_STATS_BH(net, idev, IPSTATS_MIB_INDELIVERS); > > The CodingStyle dictates that all branches must have {} if at least > one has them. Thanks Sergei, I appreciate the review. I will make these changes in a v3 after I get feedback this is the correct fix for the problem. Josh