From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
To: Chen Baozi <cbz@baozis.org>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
Chen Baozi <baozich@gmail.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 04/10] xen/arm: Use cpumask_t type for vcpu_mask in vgic_to_sgi
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 14:05:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556B072E.3010504@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432984051-10838-5-git-send-email-cbz@baozis.org>
Hi Chen,
On 30/05/2015 12:07, Chen Baozi wrote:
> From: Chen Baozi <baozich@gmail.com>
>
> Use cpumask_t instead of unsigned long which can only express 64 cpus at
> the most. Add the {gicv2|gicv3}_sgir_to_cpumask in corresponding vGICs
> to translate GICD_SGIR/ICC_SGI1R_EL1 to vcpu_mask for vgic_to_sgi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <baozich@gmail.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 1 +
> xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h | 2 ++
> xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> index 3be1a51..17a3c9f 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,15 @@
> #include <asm/gic.h>
> #include <asm/vgic.h>
>
> +static inline void gicv2_sgir_to_cpumask(cpumask_t *cpumask,
> + const register_t sgir)
> +{
> + unsigned long target_list;
> +
> + target_list = ((sgir & GICD_SGI_TARGET_MASK) >> GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT);
> + bitmap_copy(cpumask_bits(cpumask), &target_list, GICD_SGI_TARGET_BITS);
> +}
> +
> static int vgic_v2_distr_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info)
> {
> struct hsr_dabt dabt = info->dabt;
> @@ -201,16 +210,17 @@ static int vgic_v2_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir)
> int virq;
> int irqmode;
> enum gic_sgi_mode sgi_mode;
> - unsigned long vcpu_mask = 0;
> + cpumask_t vcpu_mask;
>
> + cpumask_clear(&vcpu_mask);
> irqmode = (sgir & GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_MASK) >> GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_SHIFT;
> virq = (sgir & GICD_SGI_INTID_MASK);
> - vcpu_mask = (sgir & GICD_SGI_TARGET_MASK) >> GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT;
>
> /* Map GIC sgi value to enum value */
> switch ( irqmode )
> {
> case GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_VAL:
> + gicv2_sgir_to_cpumask(&vcpu_mask, sgir);
> sgi_mode = SGI_TARGET_LIST;
> break;
> case GICD_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS_VAL:
> @@ -226,7 +236,7 @@ static int vgic_v2_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - return vgic_to_sgi(v, sgir, sgi_mode, virq, vcpu_mask);
> + return vgic_to_sgi(v, sgir, sgi_mode, virq, &vcpu_mask);
> }
>
> static int vgic_v2_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info)
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> index ef9a71a..a283c8c 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -972,22 +972,33 @@ write_ignore:
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static inline void gicv3_sgir_to_cpumask(cpumask_t *cpumask,
> + const register_t sgir)
> +{
> + unsigned long target_list;
> +
> + target_list = sgir & ICH_SGI_TARGETLIST_MASK;
> + bitmap_copy(cpumask_bits(cpumask), &target_list, ICH_SGI_TARGET_BITS);
> +
Spurious line.
> +}
> +
> static int vgic_v3_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir)
> {
> int virq;
> int irqmode;
> enum gic_sgi_mode sgi_mode;
> - unsigned long vcpu_mask = 0;
> + cpumask_t vcpu_mask;
>
> + cpumask_clear(&vcpu_mask);
> irqmode = (sgir >> ICH_SGI_IRQMODE_SHIFT) & ICH_SGI_IRQMODE_MASK;
> virq = (sgir >> ICH_SGI_IRQ_SHIFT ) & ICH_SGI_IRQ_MASK;
> - /* SGI's are injected at Rdist level 0. ignoring affinity 1, 2, 3 */
> - vcpu_mask = sgir & ICH_SGI_TARGETLIST_MASK;
>
> /* Map GIC sgi value to enum value */
> switch ( irqmode )
> {
> case ICH_SGI_TARGET_LIST:
> + /* SGI's are injected at Rdist level 0. ignoring affinity 1, 2, 3 */
> + gicv3_sgir_to_cpumask(&vcpu_mask, sgir);
> sgi_mode = SGI_TARGET_LIST;
> break;
> case ICH_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS:
> @@ -998,7 +1009,7 @@ static int vgic_v3_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - return vgic_to_sgi(v, sgir, sgi_mode, virq, vcpu_mask);
> + return vgic_to_sgi(v, sgir, sgi_mode, virq, &vcpu_mask);
> }
>
> static int vgic_v3_emulate_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, union hsr hsr)
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> index 7b387b7..f9e43f9 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -318,16 +318,12 @@ void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n)
> }
> }
>
> -/* TODO: unsigned long is used to fit vcpu_mask.*/
> int vgic_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir, enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, int virq,
> - unsigned long vcpu_mask)
> + cpumask_t *vcpu_mask)
> {
> struct domain *d = v->domain;
> - int vcpuid;
> int i;
>
> - ASSERT(d->max_vcpus < 8*sizeof(vcpu_mask));
> -
As said in the previous version, cpumask_t is based on NR_CPUS and there
is no relation between NR_CPUS and MAX_VIRT_CPUS. Furthermore, NR_CPUS
which can be configured at build time by the user (see MAX_PHYS_CPUS).
We need to catch at build time possible when the cpumask_t would be
smaller in order to avoid insecure hypervisor.
> ASSERT( virq < 16 );
>
> switch ( irqmode )
> @@ -341,12 +337,12 @@ int vgic_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir, enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, int
> * SGI_TARGET_SELF mode. So Force vcpu_mask to 0
> */
> perfc_incr(vgic_sgi_others);
> - vcpu_mask = 0;
> + cpumask_clear(vcpu_mask);
Given that you already clear the cpumask on the caller of this function,
I think we can consider that it will be nice with us rather than wasting
CPU time to clear twice. That would require to update the comment above.
> for ( i = 0; i < d->max_vcpus; i++ )
> {
> if ( i != current->vcpu_id && d->vcpu[i] != NULL &&
> is_vcpu_online(d->vcpu[i]) )
> - set_bit(i, &vcpu_mask);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(i, vcpu_mask);
> }
> break;
> case SGI_TARGET_SELF:
> @@ -355,8 +351,8 @@ int vgic_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir, enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, int
> * SGI_TARGET_SELF mode. So Force vcpu_mask to 0
> */
> perfc_incr(vgic_sgi_self);
> - vcpu_mask = 0;
> - set_bit(current->vcpu_id, &vcpu_mask);
> + cpumask_clear(vcpu_mask);
Ditto.
> + cpumask_set_cpu(current->vcpu_id, vcpu_mask);
> break;
> default:
> gprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,
> @@ -365,15 +361,17 @@ int vgic_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir, enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, int
> return 0;
> }
>
> - for_each_set_bit( vcpuid, &vcpu_mask, d->max_vcpus )
> + for ( i = cpumask_first(vcpu_mask);
> + i < d->max_vcpus;
> + i = cpumask_next(i, vcpu_mask))
The indentation looks wrong here. And why don't you use vcpuid? It would
have avoid the renaming vcpuid/i below which increase the path size for
nothing.
> {
> - if ( d->vcpu[vcpuid] != NULL && !is_vcpu_online(d->vcpu[vcpuid]) )
> + if ( d->vcpu[i] != NULL && !is_vcpu_online(d->vcpu[i]) )
> {
> gprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "VGIC: write r=%"PRIregister" \
> - vcpu_mask=%lx, wrong CPUTargetList\n", sgir, vcpu_mask);
> + , wrong CPUTargetList\n", sgir);
> continue;
> }
> - vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(d->vcpu[vcpuid], virq);
> + vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(d->vcpu[i], virq);
> }
> return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> index 463fffb..c6ef4bf 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
> #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_SELF_VAL (2)
> #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT (16)
> #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_MASK (0xFFUL<<GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT)
> +#define GICD_SGI_TARGET_BITS (8)
> #define GICD_SGI_GROUP1 (1UL<<15)
> #define GICD_SGI_INTID_MASK (0xFUL)
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h
> index 556f114..e106e67 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,8 @@
> #define ICH_SGI_IRQ_SHIFT 24
> #define ICH_SGI_IRQ_MASK 0xf
> #define ICH_SGI_TARGETLIST_MASK 0xffff
> +#define ICH_SGI_TARGET_BITS 16
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_ARM_GIC_V3_DEFS_H__ */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
> index 6dcdf9f..2f413e1 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ DEFINE_VGIC_OPS(3)
> extern int vcpu_vgic_free(struct vcpu *v);
> extern int vgic_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir,
> enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, int virq,
> - unsigned long vcpu_mask);
> + cpumask_t *vcpu_mask);
> extern void vgic_migrate_irq(struct vcpu *old, struct vcpu *new, unsigned int irq);
>
> /* Reserve a specific guest vIRQ */
>
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-31 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-30 11:07 [PATCH V5 00/10] Support more than 8 vcpus on arm64 with GICv3 Chen Baozi
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 01/10] xen/arm: gic-v3: Increase the size of GICR in address space for guest Chen Baozi
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 02/10] xen/arm: Add functions of mapping between vCPUID and virtual affinity Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 12:51 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 03/10] xen/arm: Use the new functions for vCPUID/vaffinity transformation Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 12:53 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 04/10] xen/arm: Use cpumask_t type for vcpu_mask in vgic_to_sgi Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 13:05 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 05/10] xen/arm64: gicv3: Use AFF1 when translating ICC_SGI1R_EL1 to cpumask Chen Baozi
2015-05-30 11:15 ` Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 13:14 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-31 15:25 ` Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 17:58 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 06/10] tools/libxl: Set 'reg' of cpu node equal to MPIDR affinity for domU Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 13:16 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 07/10] xen/arm: Set 'reg' of cpu node for dom0 to match MPIDR's affinity Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 13:20 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 08/10] xen: Call arch_domain_create() before evtchn_init() Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 13:29 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 09/10] xen/arm: make domain_max_vcpus return value from vgic_ops Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 13:35 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-31 15:31 ` Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 18:05 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-31 18:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-05-30 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 10/10] xen/arm64: increase MAX_VIRT_CPUS to 128 on arm64 Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 13:40 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-31 15:37 ` Chen Baozi
2015-05-31 18:21 ` Julien Grall
2015-06-01 0:56 ` Chen Baozi
2015-06-01 8:04 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556B072E.3010504@citrix.com \
--to=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=baozich@gmail.com \
--cc=cbz@baozis.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.