From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7DD40E009AD; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 05:52:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.94.94.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D898E00547 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 05:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t51Cqkjn015509 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 07:52:46 -0500 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlemailx.itg.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t51CqkAm032094 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 07:52:46 -0500 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 07:52:45 -0500 Received: from [10.218.109.201] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t51CqjvI006968; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 07:52:45 -0500 Message-ID: <556C559D.7070601@ti.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:52:45 -0400 From: Jacob Stiffler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Dmytriyenko References: <1431094194-11852-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> <1431094194-11852-2-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> <22A42254-B630-4E50-BB82-A52F1FA2CD84@gmail.com> <554CEFB6.3070708@ti.com> <20150519201102.GD31845@edge> <555C621A.6090704@ti.com> <20150522181216.GD8903@edge> <55674045.9080509@ti.com> <20150529193747.GP16418@edge> In-Reply-To: <20150529193747.GP16418@edge> Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04 X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:52:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/29/2015 3:37 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: >> >> On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: >>>> On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>>> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: >>>>>> I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See >>>>>> recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb). >>>>>> >>>>>> These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get >>>>>> installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for >>>>>> building firmware. >>>>> Should they be "-native" then? >>>>> >>>> I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before. >>>> >>>> If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all >>>> paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET >>> Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point. >>> Can we simply FILES_${PN} += "*" to pick up everything installed and shove it >>> into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps can be >>> used on the target in the future... >>> >> Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be >> pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the >> ${PN}-dev package (they are purely development files), and then >> ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"? > Actually, that's a good idea. Should we modify other recipes similarly, when > they only provide build dependencies for DSP? > It seems this would make the most sense. Should I submit patches for the recently updated packages which would be effected? They are the following: * ti-sysbios * ti-xdais I'm not sure about ti-xdctools since this includes xdc and other utilities. >>>>>> On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>>>> On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "installed-vs-shipped" >>>>>>> can this be fixed instead ? >>>>>> -- >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> meta-ti mailing list >>>>>> meta-ti@yoctoproject.org >>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti