Re: [PATCH 4/7] ASoC: wm8903: simplify gpiolib callbacks

[Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>]

On 02.06.2015 23:31, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:18:23PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> On 02.06.2015 22:41, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:09:15AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> 
>>>> @@ -1783,18 +1783,13 @@ static int wm8903_gpio_direction_in(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	struct wm8903_priv *wm8903 = gpio_to_wm8903(chip);
>>>>  	unsigned int mask, val;
>>>> -	int ret;
>>>>  
>>>>  	mask = WM8903_GPn_FN_MASK | WM8903_GPn_DIR_MASK;
>>>>  	val = (WM8903_GPn_FN_GPIO_INPUT << WM8903_GPn_FN_SHIFT) |
>>>>  		WM8903_GPn_DIR;
>>>>  
>>>> -	ret = regmap_update_bits(wm8903->regmap,
>>>> -				 WM8903_GPIO_CONTROL_1 + offset, mask, val);
>>>> -	if (ret < 0)
>>>> -		return ret;
>>>> -
>>>> -	return 0;
>>>> +	return regmap_update_bits(wm8903->regmap,
>>>> +				  WM8903_GPIO_CONTROL_1 + offset, mask, val);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>>  static int wm8903_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> 
>>> This appears to be an unrelated coding style change.
> 
>> this particular patch is named "simplify gpiolib callbacks".
> 
>> Do you prefer to separate the change here in .direction_in
>> implementation from the rest?
> 
> It doesn't appear to make any changes related to boolean variables
> (AFAICT it's just removing the ret variable) so it shouldn't be in a
> change about boolean variables.
> 

Okay, will split the change then.

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir