From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] qla2xxx: Fix various warnings reported by static source code analysis tools Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:44:29 -0700 Message-ID: <556E31CD.5020407@sandisk.com> References: <54C75AF8.90102@sandisk.com> <54EAE9A0.3090205@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1on0067.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.67]:62789 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570AbbFBWog (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2015 18:44:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Himanshu Madhani , Saurav Kashyap , Christoph Hellwig Cc: Quinn Tran , linux-scsi On 06/02/2015 01:09 PM, Himanshu Madhani wrote: > On 2/23/15, 12:49 AM, "Bart Van Assche" wrote: >> On 02/02/15 05:52, Saurav Kashyap wrote: >>> Thanks for the patches. We will run regression with these changes and >>> ack >>> if everything goes through fine. >> >> Hello Saurav, >> >> That sounds great. Are there perhaps already any results available from >> the regression tests ? > > Hello Bart, > > Replying to correct email thread. We have concluded our regression cycle. > The series looks good. > > Acked-by: Himanshu Madhani Hello Himanshu, Thank you for the feedback. Since other qla2xxx driver patches have been accepted upstream after my patch series had been posted I think the patches should be reposted. Would you prefer to do that or do you perhaps prefer that I repost that series ? Bart.