All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: avoid duplicate checks on user provided devid
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:49:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556EB19D.6010807@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150602151234.GH6761@twin.jikos.cz>


On 06/02/2015 11:12 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:25:17PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> kernel is already checking it (rightly), we don't need to check that in the user land.
>
> Sometimes it's useful to duplicate the checks in userspace because we
> can fail early and return the error message directly, compared to
> messages in syslog or a simple errno.

  right. But here what do you feel about the gain obtained vs additional
  code thats required ?

  My take: get_fs_info() calls check_mounted_where() which in turn calls
  btrfs_scan_lblkid(), which is system wide scan of all block devices,
  thats heavy weight.

  My past tests showed visible delay/jitter in the output of
  'btrfs fi show -d' when btrfs scrub is running. The main culprit
  is check_mounted_where calling btrfs_scan_lblkid. so its recommend
  to run get_fs_info() only if required.

> Have you observed that the userspace checks were problematic?

  Nope. Just a cleanup. With this patch cmd_start_replace() would
  should match with cmd_rm_dev().
  As both 'btrfs dev del <devid> ..' and 'btrfs replace start <devid> .."
  intentions are same, so theoretically up to certain extent their codes
  should match.

>> @@ -214,33 +213,7 @@ static int cmd_start_replace(int argc, char **argv)
>>   	}
>>
>>   	if (is_numerical(srcdev)) {
>> -		struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args fi_args;
>> -		struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args *di_args = NULL;
>> -
>>   		start_args.start.srcdevid = arg_strtou64(srcdev);
>> -
>> -		ret = get_fs_info(path, &fi_args, &di_args);
>
> This does additional checks, like checking where it's mounted.

  in this part of the if statement srcdev is <num> and is devid.
  get_fs_info check does not help.

  What did I miss ?

Thanks Anand

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-03  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01  6:25 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: avoid duplicate checks on user provided devid Anand Jain
2015-06-01  6:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: use function is_block_device() instead Anand Jain
2015-06-02 15:17   ` David Sterba
2015-06-02 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: avoid duplicate checks on user provided devid David Sterba
2015-06-03  7:49   ` Anand Jain [this message]
2015-06-04  3:09     ` Anand Jain
2015-06-05 15:36       ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=556EB19D.6010807@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.