Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/2] pc: fix QEMU crashing when more than ~50 memory hotplugged

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 03/06/2015 14:22, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> QEMU assert in vhost due to hitting vhost bachend limit
> on number of supported memory regions.
> 
> Instead of increasing limit in backends, describe all hotlugged
> memory as one continuos range to vhost that implements linear
> 1:1 HVA->GPA mapping in backend.
> It allows to avoid increasing VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS limit
> in kernel and refactoring current region lookup algorithm
> to a faster/scalable datastructure. The same applies to
> vhost user which has even lower limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/pc.c      |  4 ++--
>  hw/virtio/vhost.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 1eb1db0..c722339 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -1306,8 +1306,8 @@ FWCfgState *pc_memory_init(MachineState *machine,
>              exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>          }
>  
> -        memory_region_init(&pcms->hotplug_memory, OBJECT(pcms),
> -                           "hotplug-memory", hotplug_mem_size);
> +        memory_region_init_rsvd_hva(&pcms->hotplug_memory, OBJECT(pcms),
> +                                    "hotplug-memory", hotplug_mem_size);
>          memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, pcms->hotplug_memory_base,
>                                      &pcms->hotplug_memory);
>      }
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> index 54851b7..44cfaab 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> @@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ static void vhost_set_memory(MemoryListener *listener,
>      bool log_dirty = memory_region_is_logging(section->mr);
>      int s = offsetof(struct vhost_memory, regions) +
>          (dev->mem->nregions + 1) * sizeof dev->mem->regions[0];
> +    MemoryRegionSection rsvd_hva;
>      void *ram;
>  
>      dev->mem = g_realloc(dev->mem, s);
> @@ -388,17 +389,25 @@ static void vhost_set_memory(MemoryListener *listener,
>          add = false;
>      }
>  
> +    rsvd_hva = memory_region_find_rsvd_hva(section->mr);
> +    if (rsvd_hva.mr) {
> +        start_addr = rsvd_hva.offset_within_address_space;
> +        size = int128_get64(rsvd_hva.size);
> +        ram = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(rsvd_hva.mr);
> +    } else {
> +        ram = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(section->mr) + section->offset_within_region;
> +    }

I don't think this is needed.

What _could_ be useful is to merge adjacent ranges even if they are
partly unmapped, but your patch doesn't do that.

But converting to a "reserved HVA" range should have been done already
in memory_region_add_subregion_common.

Am I missing something?  (And I see now that my request about
memory_region_get_ram_ptr is linked to this bit of your patch).

Paolo

>      assert(size);
>  
>      /* Optimize no-change case. At least cirrus_vga does this a lot at this time. */
> -    ram = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(section->mr) + section->offset_within_region;
>      if (add) {
> -        if (!vhost_dev_cmp_memory(dev, start_addr, size, (uintptr_t)ram)) {
> +        if (!rsvd_hva.mr && !vhost_dev_cmp_memory(dev, start_addr, size, (uintptr_t)ram)) {
>              /* Region exists with same address. Nothing to do. */
>              return;
>          }
>      } else {
> -        if (!vhost_dev_find_reg(dev, start_addr, size)) {
> +        if (!rsvd_hva.mr && !vhost_dev_find_reg(dev, start_addr, size)) {
>              /* Removing region that we don't access. Nothing to do. */
>              return;
>          }
>