From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stableo
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:25:50 -0400
Message-ID: <556F005E.3050301@oracle.com>
References: <556DC799.5040300@citrix.com>
	<556DEB9A020000780008079A@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506021648160.19838@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<556DE405.30101@oracle.com>
	<556EB62F0200007800080B48@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>) id 1Z08gB-0005lN-Q7
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:25:59 +0000
In-Reply-To: <556EB62F0200007800080B48@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, roger.pau@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 06/03/2015 02:09 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 02.06.15 at 19:12, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>>     - working with shadow code (which is what we use when migrating HVM
>> guests). But the nice side-benefit is that we can then run PVH on
>> machines without VMX or SVM support.
> Without VMX/SVM? What's the H then in PVH? Or did you mean
> without EPT/NPT?


Yes, this must have been EPT/NPT (I don't remember where this item came 
from, TBH)

-boris