From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: packaging init systems in a more autoools style way.
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:21:21 -0600
Message-ID: <556F2981.7080806@redhat.com>
References: <556F1E19.6080704@suse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50271 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751656AbbFCQVW (ORCPT <rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:21:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <556F1E19.6080704@suse.com>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Owen Synge <osynge@suse.com>, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org

On 06/03/2015 09:32 AM, Owen Synge wrote:
> 3) We add autotools an conditional for each init system, and only
> install with make install enabled init systems scripts/config.

This plan (3) sounds great to me.

- Ken