From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2856941827632893542==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [Powertop] [RFC 0/9] Use udev for accessing sysfs Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:25:46 -0700 Message-ID: <556F62CA.3070208@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: CAJDL4uLsyFK5DJsbC1b4yKyJEqKxUKrUmGk-QZUriiz4af8QvQ@mail.gmail.com To: powertop@lists.01.org List-ID: --===============2856941827632893542== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/3/2015 1:23 PM, Nanley Chery wrote: >> >> .... how does this work on Android ? > > That's a good question. I actually hadn't considered the affects on > that platform. It seems like there is no udev-like abstraction layer > on Android. It looks like the way forward would be to either keep a > separate folder for android specific code or to create more helper > functions to abstract how we access sysfs. The latter method seems > preferable because it wouldn't increase the complexity of the project > as a whole. Thoughts? but if we keep the code anyway, what's the benefit of going through one more layer of indirection???? Am I missing something here? --===============2856941827632893542==--