From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Dreyer Subject: Re: packaging init systems in a more autoools style way. Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:36:04 -0600 Message-ID: <556F7344.4030003@redhat.com> References: <556F1E19.6080704@suse.com> <556F6480.1090901@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39441 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752072AbbFCVgF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:36:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil , Owen Synge Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 06/03/2015 02:45 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > Sounds good to me. It could (should?) even error out if no init system is > specified? Otherwise someone will likely be in for a surprise. I was picturing that we'd just autodetect based on OS version (eg Ubuntu 15.04 should default to --with-init=systemd). It's one less thing to get wrong during the build process. What do you think? - Ken