Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Bitmap based CPU enumeration

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 04/06/2015 07:44, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Bharata B Rao
> <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:59:38PM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Bharata B Rao
>>> <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> All the comments have been addressed and the series has been reviewed
>>>> by David, Eduardo and Igor. Can this series be taken in now ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Andreas' comment on P3 looks unaddressed. I think it can be handled by
>>> just putting that one sentance explanation you gave in commit message,
>>> or if its far enough out of scope just drop the change.
>>>
>>> I think Igor's comment was an out of scope suggestion in the end so
>>> nothing needed there?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> P.S. I am not the maintainer but I need to rebase on you for one of my
>>> patch sets so I'd like to help see this though!
>>
>> Should I be rebasing against latest master or anyone else's tree to make
>> it easier for inclusion ?
>>
> 
> I don't know about anyone elses tree, but there is an edit to last
> patch so a fresh complete v4 rebased is probably going to make life
> easy for whoever.
> 
> I have CCd Paolo who owns exec.c according to MAINTAINERS.

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

I wouldn't mind separating the "CPU" parts of exec.c and moving them
under Andreas and Eduardo's mantainership.  In fact, Peter, in your
patch to move stuff from cpu-exec.c to cpus.c, perhaps you can use
qom/cpu.c instead?  Then qom/cpu.c can also be the place where we can
move the CPU parts of exec.c.

Paolo