From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: netlink: Disable insertions/removals during rehash Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:58:07 -0700 Message-ID: <5570BBDF.3080309@roeck-us.net> References: <20150516131628.GA981@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150516.171019.1206903516753105739.davem@davemloft.net> <20150604162727.GA2670@roeck-us.net> <20150604.115922.1489867293287036693.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:37252 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752486AbbFDU6L (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:58:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150604.115922.1489867293287036693.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/04/2015 11:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Guenter Roeck > Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:27:27 -0700 > >> sorry for bothering you - I don't see this patch in any of your trees, >> and it is marked as "changes requested" in patchwork. Did I look >> at the wrong places, do you still plan to apply the patch as-is, >> or do you expect some changes ? >> >> As side info, I have been trying to track down the getaddrinfo >> hang problem observed by others, which we see in 3.19.4 and 4.0.4. > > Changes-requested, amazingly, means that someone gave you feedback > and changes along with a fresh resubmission is expected of you. > Yes, I understand. My problem is/was that your last e-mail on the subject suggested that you would apply the patch, while at the same time patchwork suggests that you expect to see changes. Sorry that I was - and still am - unable to correlate those two pieces of information. Guenter