From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [RFC 20/22] xen/arm: gic: Expose the vGIC versions suported by GIC Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 18:59:51 +0100 Message-ID: <5571E397.7080504@citrix.com> References: <1431091783-29090-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <1431091783-29090-21-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <1433507739.7108.264.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0vuO-0008Cj-PK for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:59:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1433507739.7108.264.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Julien Grall Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Ian, On 05/06/2015 13:35, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:29 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> Some version of the GIC are able so support multiple versions of the >> vGIC. >> >> For instance, some version of the GICv3 can as well support GICv2. >> >> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall > After my suggestion on #16 this might fit in as a flag in the proposed > gic info structs? I guess you mean vgic info? I'm thinking to add a boolean telling if the vGICvn is valid. Regards, -- -- Julien Grall