From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: firefly branch for v0.80.10 ready for QE Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:08:21 +0200 Message-ID: <5571E595.9040801@dachary.org> References: <5568915D.3040005@dachary.org> <557167D0.40201@dachary.org> <1372965780.14838160.1433516098283.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <5571DBBC.8050908@dachary.org> <1235437871.15043015.1433526463363.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E2e54ex6B2IrDInnw0XLulUgamuCMbR2C" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:57027 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752594AbbFESIY (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:08:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1235437871.15043015.1433526463363.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development , Xinxin Shu This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --E2e54ex6B2IrDInnw0XLulUgamuCMbR2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have Nathan to thank for catching this today ;-) On 05/06/2015 19:47, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Then it still in the queue and I will reschedule to pick up the latest = code. >=20 > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yuri Weinstein" > Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Xinxin Shu" > Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 10:26:20 AM > Subject: Re: firefly branch for v0.80.10 ready for QE >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 05/06/2015 16:54, Yuri Weinstein wrote: >> Loic >> >> Thx for the heads up. >> >> Would that touch only the "rgw" suite? >=20 > Yes. >=20 >> >> Thx >> YuriW >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Loic Dachary" >> To: "Yuri Weinstein" >> Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Xinxin Shu" >> Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 2:11:44 AM >> Subject: Re: firefly branch for v0.80.10 ready for QE >> >> Hi Yuri, >> >> A month passed since this mail was sent and the firefly branch has a f= ew additional commits. All but one (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/482= 9 with more information at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11890) have bee= n tested. This exception seems harmless but I thought you should know.=20 >> >> For the record, the head of the firefly branch now is https://github.c= om/ceph/ceph/commit/d0f9c5f47024f53b4eccea2e0fde9b7844746362 and http://t= racker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information has been updated accordi= ngly. >> >> Cheers >> >> On 29/05/2015 18:18, Loic Dachary wrote:> Hi Yuri, >>> >>> The firefly branch for v0.80.10 as found at https://github.com/ceph/c= eph/commits/firefly has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and i= s ready for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/= commit/071c94385ee71b86c5ed8363d56cf299da1aa7b3 and the details of the te= sts run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090 >>> >>> Cheers >>> >> >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --E2e54ex6B2IrDInnw0XLulUgamuCMbR2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVx5ZUACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20PlgCdH1u5H+Ltv9urqnwkm5kdWQa0 Bg4AnjwlPjt4MvGbotGrELgWbzWNrKUR =6Vd/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E2e54ex6B2IrDInnw0XLulUgamuCMbR2C--