From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: provisioning teuthology targets with OpenStack Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 19:04:52 +0200 Message-ID: <557479B4.9060207@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OHE3K3EctTUoR75INLnH2IS9hpmA4OrpR" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:57837 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751722AbbFGRFA (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jun 2015 13:05:00 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Zack Cerza Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OHE3K3EctTUoR75INLnH2IS9hpmA4OrpR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Zack, I'm motivated by my recent experience with hacking teuthology and contain= ers :-) I'd like to give http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6502 "provision targets using a cloud API"= a shot with OpenStack in mind (because I know nothing of EC2 really). The= idea is to make it relatively easy for someone with access to an OpenSta= ck tenant to using instead of downburst. Not only would that simplify the= development process for people without access to the lab, it would also = allow the addition of more horsepower to the lab. What do you think ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --OHE3K3EctTUoR75INLnH2IS9hpmA4OrpR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlV0ebQACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23FzwCgxKJDAdmEAb05TClhqEIUJfxx w88AmgOZPRi01xQLn6e8QfRV9Wk9Nqdy =2lPv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OHE3K3EctTUoR75INLnH2IS9hpmA4OrpR--