All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Louis Langholtz <lou_langholtz@me.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Trivial patch monkey <trivial@kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug: Deprecate BUG_ON() use in new code, introduce CRASH_ON()
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 20:07:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5575D9C4.50204@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608112702.GA20511@gmail.com>

Am 08.06.2015 um 13:27 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
>
> * Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> wrote:
>
>>> I am pretty certain that Greg would have applied such a patch in an eye blink.
>>
>> As you've said it, *probably*. But such a simple exit path as you're proposing
>> doesn't always exist. [...]
>
> As I said it's case by case. I discussed your example (which was a deficient patch
> for multiple reasons) but we'd be wasting everyone's time by discussion
> hypothethical situations.

Sure it was a deficient patch, but still better than what existed for a 
year long in the kernel and which leaded to a reset of a system sometime 
after a wireless remote connected device was turned off. And it showed 
exactly where the problem existed. Maybe I should mention that almost a 
year after I've posted that patch, people still stumbled over the 
problem (and likely had the same hard time to find the reason for a 
sudden reboot without any warning).

I just want to make clear that a brutforce slogan like BUG_ON is bad is 
bad, especially as there are many people which just might repeat that 
slogan without thinking about what they are repeating.

Alexander Holler

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-08 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=143351431301630>
2015-06-07 23:54 ` [PATCH] kernel/params.c: make use of unused but set variable Louis Langholtz
2015-06-08  0:00   ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-08  0:17     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-08  0:58       ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-08  5:24         ` [PATCH v2] " Louis Langholtz
2015-06-10 17:05         ` [PATCH] " Louis Langholtz
2015-06-11  1:54           ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-12  3:17             ` Louis Langholtz
2015-06-08  5:44       ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on BUG and BUG_ON uses Joe Perches
2015-06-08  5:46       ` [PATCH] kernel/params.c: make use of unused but set variable Louis Langholtz
2015-06-08  7:12       ` [PATCH] debug: Deprecate BUG_ON() use in new code, introduce CRASH_ON() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08  7:40         ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08  8:08           ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-08  8:42             ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08  9:05               ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08  9:11                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08  9:22                   ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 11:29                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08  9:16                 ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08 11:27                   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-08 18:07                     ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2015-06-08 19:35                       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-09  1:07                         ` Alexander Holler
2015-06-08  8:09           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-12  1:27       ` [PATCH] kernel/params.c: make use of unused but set variable Rusty Russell
2015-06-12  1:48         ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-14 19:49           ` Rusty Russell
2015-06-16 19:54             ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-08 14:26 [PATCH] debug: Deprecate BUG_ON() use in new code, introduce CRASH_ON() Alexey Dobriyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5575D9C4.50204@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lou_langholtz@me.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.