From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1Z2HH4-0000Xw-3u for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:00:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55347) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2HGu-0000TC-NX for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:00:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2HGt-0008H8-Jl for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:00:44 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:37810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2HGm-000852-VL; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:00:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.88.2] (mjt.vpn.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.99]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A33940EA1; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:00:29 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <5576C74D.1050906@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:00:29 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gonglei , Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" References: <1431477807-12220-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <555AEA20.3090501@huawei.com> <556C0B7A.3070601@huawei.com> <20150601122437-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <556C429F.3070802@redhat.com> <5576428A.4030603@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5576428A.4030603@huawei.com> OpenPGP: id=804465C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 86.62.121.231 Cc: "qemu-trivial@nongnu.org" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 0/6] pci/isa: QOMify X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:00:45 -0000 09.06.2015 04:34, Gonglei wrote: > /mjt, what's your opinion? Thanks Somehow I thought it is a single patch, and tried to find it @patchwork. But it is a series of 6 patches (which I deleted from my inbox due to routine cleanup procedure). > Gonglei (6): > pci-assign: QOMify > piix: piix3 QOMify > piix4: QOMify > wdt_i6300esb: QOMify > xen_pt: QOMify > vt82c686: QOMify Do we care about pci-assign? Maybe it's better to drop this code completely instead of fixing it? Other than that, I think it's okay to apply this series to -trivial. Thanks, /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2HGs-0000Rf-QG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:00:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2HGn-0008C8-AC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:00:42 -0400 Message-ID: <5576C74D.1050906@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:00:29 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1431477807-12220-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <555AEA20.3090501@huawei.com> <556C0B7A.3070601@huawei.com> <20150601122437-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <556C429F.3070802@redhat.com> <5576428A.4030603@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5576428A.4030603@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] pci/isa: QOMify List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gonglei , Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: "qemu-trivial@nongnu.org" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com 09.06.2015 04:34, Gonglei wrote: > /mjt, what's your opinion? Thanks Somehow I thought it is a single patch, and tried to find it @patchwork. But it is a series of 6 patches (which I deleted from my inbox due to routine cleanup procedure). > Gonglei (6): > pci-assign: QOMify > piix: piix3 QOMify > piix4: QOMify > wdt_i6300esb: QOMify > xen_pt: QOMify > vt82c686: QOMify Do we care about pci-assign? Maybe it's better to drop this code completely instead of fixing it? Other than that, I think it's okay to apply this series to -trivial. Thanks, /mjt