From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: Checking on wip-blkin branch Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:44:58 -0700 Message-ID: <5576FBEA.8030805@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37095 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932950AbbFIOpA (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:45:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Xue, Chendi" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Shewmaker Hi Chendi, On 06/09/2015 04:59 AM, Xue, Chendi wrote: > Hi, Josh and Andrew > > Today, I applied wip-blkin branch to my 4 nodes ceph setup, and created zipkin-based lttng results successfully. > > Since we wanna using this latency analyzing methodology on further release or on keyvalue store and newstore. > I am wondering what is the gap to merge blkin into master? Can I help to rebase to master, so we can merge this branch? That'd be great! Andrew and I simply haven't had time to finish fixing up the remaining issues. Running it through a rados suite showed some more changes were necessary to handle more complicated osd usage - you'll see several osd crashes in this rados suite run [1]. The code was looking fine to me, it just needs rebasing and debugging so it can pass the rados test suite. Thanks! Josh [1] http://pulpito.ceph.com/joshd-2015-03-25_17:29:16-rados-wip-blkin---blkin-multi/