From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:35531 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752109AbbFJIav (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 04:30:51 -0400 Received: by pdbnf5 with SMTP id nf5so33058012pdb.2 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5577F5A0.9050100@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:00:24 +0530 From: Varka Bhadram MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: nl802154 enum misspelled, just send patch? References: <20150610082449.GA20831@arazu> In-Reply-To: <20150610082449.GA20831@arazu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoffer Holmstedt , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org On 06/10/2015 01:54 PM, Christoffer Holmstedt wrote: > Hi > While working on the CCA improvements to wpan-tools I noticed that one of the > enums has a value misspelled. As the header is not in UAPI yet I suggest we > fix this. > > NL802154_CCA_UWB_MULTIPEXED is missing an l (ell) in multiplexed. > > The header file is included in wpan-tools repository and available in the > kernel. Should I just send a patch for bluetooth-next and then the new header > file is copied over to wpan-tools repository or what is the procedure here? > > I assume normal procedure for more "stable" user-space software is that the > kernel header file(s) should not be included in the user-space tool but instead > included and linked against the kernel headers (from running system or similiar > source). At the moment the nl802154 header is included in wpan-tools to make it > easier to build while developing. > > So, should I send a patch for both bluetooth-next and wpan-tools or just > bluetooth-next? Send patch for both trees . :-) -- Varka Bhadram