From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] EFI/early: add /mapbs to map EfiBootServices{Code, Data} Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:15:35 +0100 Message-ID: <55781C570200007800082F01@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <55770B190200007800082A2C@mail.emea.novell.com> <55770BDF0200007800082A43@mail.emea.novell.com> <1433926580.30003.4.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2c6m-0004lA-Kl for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:15:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1433926580.30003.4.camel@citrix.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , roy.franz@linaro.org Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 10.06.15 at 10:56, wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 14:53 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> >> To help on certain platforms to run. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > To be effective (or at least consistent) on ARM, would we also want to > change its efi_process_memory_map_bootinfo: > if ( desc_ptr->Type == EfiConventionalMemory > || desc_ptr->Type == EfiBootServicesCode > || desc_ptr->Type == EfiBootServicesData ) > to include a check on map_bs? I'm not convinced, but I also don't know the history of why boot services areas are being included here in the first place - Roy? I.e. if the checks weren't there already, I'd agree that an addition similar to the other ones would be needed here, but with the x86 side getting relaxed I don't see why you would want to tighten the ARM side at the same time. Jan