From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Hanna Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:11:15 -0400 Subject: [lustre-devel] Working on client merge In-Reply-To: <55787B02.4080802@cray.com> References: <6E6D936CCB2E3C428716BD24C5C6CDF2643227@CFWEX01.americas.cray.com> <3c566cdc50934ed6a1c5a629172da29c@EXCHCS32.ornl.gov> <55787B02.4080802@cray.com> Message-ID: <55787DC3.2020901@iu.edu> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org I'd be happy to continue work on the format, whitespace, and coding style changes, on any areas that aren't already spoken for. Chris On 6/10/15 1:59 PM, Patrick Farrell wrote: > I suggest breaking it up first by work type. As Julia noted, > coccinelle/checkpatch/etc fixes (coding style, straightforward errors > caught by the tools, sparse complaints, warnings, etc.) rarely require > awareness of the larger flow of the design. > > Then there is some other types of cleanup that require more Lustre > knowledge to tackle. If possible, those would be better for someone > like Ben (or you, James) to work on. What do we have for that kind of > work? > > - Patrick > > On 06/10/2015 12:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: >> >> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Simmons, James A. wrote: >> >>>> Where would be a good place to get started with helping merge the >>>> client >>> into mainline? >>> >>> >>> Hi Ben >>> >>> >>> Thanks for helping out for this work. I added people in the >>> chain that >>> have contributed a great >>> >>> deal to the upstream client so we can coordinate our work. Also I >>> like to >>> make people aware >>> >>> a lustre IRC channel does exist. Andreas can supply the details >>> about the >>> IRC channel. Currently >>> >>> my work has been focused on the libcfs/lnet layer. I had discuss >>> early with >>> Mike Shuey since he >>> >>> was also working in that area but will be migrating to the lustre core. >>> >>> >>> Since more people are getting involved we need to find a way >>> to break >>> up the work to avoid >>> >>> duplicate work. Should the work be broken up by layer, i.e lov, >>> mdc, or by >>> task such as removing >>> >>> specific checkpatch errors with files? >> For the work I have done with Coccinelle, it is more convenient to do >> the >> whole thing. Breaking things up by layer is not helpful. >> >> This is just a data point, though. It doesn't have to imply anything >> about >> how others work on the code. >> >> julia >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lustre-devel mailing list >> lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-devel mailing list > lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: