From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Ed White <edmund.h.white@intel.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: ravi.sahita@intel.com, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Alternate p2m design specification
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:23:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5578808C.4000602@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55778039.3050000@intel.com>
On 10/06/15 01:09, Ed White wrote:
> This document describes a new capability for VM Introspection, Security and Privacy in Xen. The new capability is called “altp2m” (short for Alternate p2m) that is used to provide the ability for Xen to host alternate guest physical memory domains for a specific guest-domain. This document describes the overall design specific to Xen for your review and feedback.
This is a very thorough description, and everything here seems in order.
A couple of remarks,
> The altp2m functionality allows the capability to be used via an agent operating in an HVM guest or alternately an agent operating in a separate privileged domain. For cross domain operation, an XSM hook is defined such that the administrator can define a policy for inter-domain VM introspection.
There should be an interlock to prevent both an internal and external
entity from actually being able to use the altp2m infrastructure.
Nothing good can come of an uncoordinated attempt like this, whereas a
coordinated use would already have to be communicating far more than the
hypercalls themselves would allow.
Also, hardware accelerated altp2m is mutually exclusive with EPT PML, as
we have no way of determining which translation was in use when a gpa
was appended to the buffer. We are going to have to maintain a feature
compatibility matrix. Even for non-accelerated altp2m, the cost of
working out the real gpa is likely prohibitive, and we should probably
resort to declaring logdirty and altp2m as exclusive features.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-10 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-10 0:09 Alternate p2m design specification Ed White
2015-06-10 7:43 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-10 16:39 ` Ed White
2015-06-11 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-11 16:30 ` Ed White
2015-06-10 18:23 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-06-10 19:41 ` Ed White
2015-06-10 23:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-10 23:41 ` Ed White
2015-06-11 12:06 ` Tim Deegan
2015-06-11 16:23 ` Ed White
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5578808C.4000602@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=edmund.h.white@intel.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=ravi.sahita@intel.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.