From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Z2p3l-0006b8-N7 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:05:27 +0000 Message-ID: <5578C299.2010200@nod.at> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:04:57 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cyl Subject: Re: ubifs problem References: <2b88f8ae.15caa.14ddab0368e.Coremail.cyl665236@126.com> <557791DF.9040501@huawei.com> <4849a0b5.1368.14ddfb33013.Coremail.cyl665236@126.com> In-Reply-To: <4849a0b5.1368.14ddfb33013.Coremail.cyl665236@126.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtd mailing list , Sheng Yong List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 11.06.2015 um 00:59 schrieb cyl: > The default flash of the development board is a 128M "SLC" nand which is mx30lf4g28ab , I want a bigger one so I changed it to K9G8G08U0M which is a "MLC" flash. Does UBIFS support > MLC nandflash not good as supporting SLC nandflash? Will it be better if I use a SLC nand? UBIFS was designed with SLC NAND in mind. If you use MLC you really have to know what you're doing. Thanks, //richard