From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yang Hongyang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 COLOPre 01/13] libxc/restore: fix error handle of process_record Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:10:34 +0800 Message-ID: <5578EE1A.1060500@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1433734997-26570-1-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1433734997-26570-2-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1433948134.30003.95.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1433948134.30003.95.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, yunhong.jiang@intel.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, rshriram@cs.ubc.ca List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/10/2015 10:55 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:43 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote: >> If the err is RECORD_NOT_PROCESSED, and it is an optional record, >> restore will still fail. The patch fix this. > > Whichever approach you take to fixing this, please say _how_ the change > fixes it, it's not at all clear why moving this code should matter. > > And if there is an ulterior motive behind the move, please say that too. Okay, will describe this in the next version, thank you! > >> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang >> CC: Ian Campbell >> CC: Ian Jackson >> CC: Wei Liu >> CC: Andrew Cooper >> --- >> tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c >> index 9e27dba..2d2edd3 100644 >> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c >> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_restore.c >> @@ -560,19 +560,6 @@ static int process_record(struct xc_sr_context *ctx, struct xc_sr_record *rec) >> free(rec->data); >> rec->data = NULL; >> >> - if ( rc == RECORD_NOT_PROCESSED ) >> - { >> - if ( rec->type & REC_TYPE_OPTIONAL ) >> - DPRINTF("Ignoring optional record %#x (%s)", >> - rec->type, rec_type_to_str(rec->type)); >> - else >> - { >> - ERROR("Mandatory record %#x (%s) not handled", >> - rec->type, rec_type_to_str(rec->type)); >> - rc = -1; >> - } >> - } >> - >> return rc; >> } >> >> @@ -678,7 +665,20 @@ static int restore(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) >> else >> { >> rc = process_record(ctx, &rec); >> - if ( rc ) >> + if ( rc == RECORD_NOT_PROCESSED ) >> + { >> + if ( rec.type & REC_TYPE_OPTIONAL ) >> + DPRINTF("Ignoring optional record %#x (%s)", >> + rec.type, rec_type_to_str(rec.type)); >> + else >> + { >> + ERROR("Mandatory record %#x (%s) not handled", >> + rec.type, rec_type_to_str(rec.type)); >> + rc = -1; >> + goto err; >> + } >> + } >> + else if ( rc ) >> goto err; >> } >> > > > . > -- Thanks, Yang.