From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
neilb@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -stable] block: fix ext_dev_lock lockdep report
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:51:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55793DF0.1000406@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150611034540.15034.24413.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 06/11/2015, 05:47 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> =================================
> [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> 4.1.0-rc7+ #217 Tainted: G O
> ---------------------------------
> inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
> swapper/6/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
> (ext_devt_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff8143a60c>] blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70
> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
> [<ffffffff810bf6b1>] __lock_acquire+0x461/0x1e70
> [<ffffffff810c1947>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0x290
> [<ffffffff818ac3a8>] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
> [<ffffffff8143a07d>] blk_alloc_devt+0x6d/0xd0 <-- take the lock in process context
> [..]
> [<ffffffff810bf64e>] __lock_acquire+0x3fe/0x1e70
> [<ffffffff810c00ad>] ? __lock_acquire+0xe5d/0x1e70
> [<ffffffff810c1947>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0x290
> [<ffffffff8143a60c>] ? blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70
> [<ffffffff818ac3a8>] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
> [<ffffffff8143a60c>] ? blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70
> [<ffffffff8143a60c>] blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70 <-- take the lock in softirq
> [<ffffffff8143bfec>] part_release+0x1c/0x50
> [<ffffffff8158edf6>] device_release+0x36/0xb0
> [<ffffffff8145ac2b>] kobject_cleanup+0x7b/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff8145aad0>] kobject_put+0x30/0x70
> [<ffffffff8158f147>] put_device+0x17/0x20
> [<ffffffff8143c29c>] delete_partition_rcu_cb+0x16c/0x180
> [<ffffffff8143c130>] ? read_dev_sector+0xa0/0xa0
> [<ffffffff810e0e0f>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x2ff/0xa90
> [<ffffffff810e0dcf>] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0x2bf/0xa90
> [<ffffffff81067e2e>] __do_softirq+0xde/0x600
>
> Neil sees this in his tests and it also triggers on pmem driver unbind
> for the libnvdimm tests. This fix is on top of an initial fix by Keith
> for incorrect usage of mutex_lock() in this path: 2da78092dda1 "block:
> Fix dev_t minor allocation lifetime". Both this and 2da78092dda1 are
> candidates for -stable.
And what is *this* in terms of SHA? Thanks.
> Fixes: 2da78092dda1 ("block: Fix dev_t minor allocation lifetime")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Note that 2da78092dda1 had "Cc: stable@kernel.org" instead of @vger.kernel.org.
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 3:47 [PATCH -stable] block: fix ext_dev_lock lockdep report Dan Williams
2015-06-11 7:51 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2015-06-11 14:07 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-11 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55793DF0.1000406@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.