All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Yuan Sun <sunyuan3@huawei.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH V2] containers: new testcase userns03
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:55:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55799344.5090100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433840491-21403-1-git-send-email-sunyuan3@huawei.com>

On 06/09/2015 11:01 AM, Yuan Sun wrote:
>   ID-outside-ns is interpreted according to which process is opening the file.
> If the process opening the file is in the same user namespace as the process
> PID, then ID-outside-ns is defined with respect to the parent user namespace.
> If the process opening the file is in a different user namespace, then
> ID-outside-ns is defined with respect to the user namespace of the process
> opening the file.
>   If kernel version >= 3.19.0, the case will ignore the git check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Sun <sunyuan3@huawei.com>

Hi,

> ---
>  testcases/kernel/containers/userns/userns03.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++

please also add it to .gitignore and container runtest file.

>  1 file changed, 250 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/containers/userns/userns03.c
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/containers/userns/userns03.c b/testcases/kernel/containers/userns/userns03.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..01308f6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/containers/userns/userns03.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
> +/*
> +* Copyright (c) Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., 2015
> +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> +* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> +* Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> +* any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
> +* useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General
> +* Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU
> +* General Public License along with this program.
> +*/
> +
> +/*
> +* Verify that:
> +* /proc/PID/uid_map and /proc/PID/gid_map contains three values separated by
> +* white space:
> +* ID-inside-ns   ID-outside-ns   length
> +*
> +*  ID-outside-ns is interpreted according to which process is opening the file.
> +* If the process opening the file is in the same user namespace as the process
> +* PID, then ID-outside-ns is defined with respect to the parent user namespace.
> +* If the process opening the file is in a different user namespace, then
> +* ID-outside-ns is defined with respect to the user namespace of the process
> +* opening the file.
> +*/
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <assert.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include "test.h"
> +#include "libclone.h"
> +#include "userns_helper.h"
> +
> +char *TCID = "user_namespace3";
> +int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> +static int cpid1, parentuid, parentgid;
> +static bool setgroups;

I'd suggest to use different name, since there already is setgroups(2) function.

> +
> +#define CHILD1UID 0
> +#define CHILD1GID 0
> +#define CHILD2UID 200
> +#define CHILD2GID 200
> +
> +/*
> + * child_fn1() - Inside a new user namespace
> + */
> +static int child_fn1(void)
> +{
> +	TST_SAFE_CHECKPOINT_WAKE_AND_WAIT(NULL, 0);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * child_fn2() - Inside a new user namespace
> + */
> +static int child_fn2(void)
> +{
> +	int exit_val;
> +	int uid, gid;
> +	char cpid1uidpath[BUFSIZ];
> +	char cpid1gidpath[BUFSIZ];
> +	int idinsidens, idoutsidens, length;
> +
> +	uid = geteuid();
> +	gid = getegid();
> +
> +	if (uid == CHILD2UID) {
> +		printf("Got expected uid.\n");
> +		exit_val = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		printf("unexpected uid=%d\n", uid);
> +		exit_val = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (setgroups == 0) {
> +		if (uid == CHILD2UID && gid == CHILD2GID) {

You are comparing uid twice, but that's just a minor.

> +			printf("Got expected uid and gid.\n");
> +			exit_val = 0;
> +		} else {
> +			printf("unexpected: uid=%d gid=%d\n", uid, gid);
> +			exit_val = 1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/*Get the uid parameters of the child_fn2 process.*/
> +	SAFE_FILE_SCANF(NULL, "/proc/self/uid_map", "%d %d %d", &idinsidens,
> +		&idoutsidens, &length);
> +
> +	/* map file format:ID-inside-ns   ID-outside-ns   length
> +	If the process opening the file is in the same user namespace as
> +	the process PID, then ID-outside-ns is defined with respect to the
> +	 parent user namespace.*/
> +	if (idinsidens != CHILD2UID || idoutsidens != parentuid) {
> +		printf("child_fn2 checks /proc/cpid2/uid_map:\n");
> +		printf("unexpected: idinsidens=%d idoutsidens=%d\n",
> +			idinsidens, idoutsidens);
> +		exit_val = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	sprintf(cpid1uidpath, "/proc/%d/uid_map", cpid1);
> +	SAFE_FILE_SCANF(NULL, cpid1uidpath, "%d %d %d", &idinsidens,
> +		&idoutsidens, &length);
> +
> +	/* If the process opening the file is in a different user namespace,
> +	then ID-outside-ns is defined with respect to the user namespace
> +	of the process opening the file.*/
> +	if (idinsidens != CHILD1UID || idoutsidens != CHILD2UID) {
> +		printf("child_fn2 checks /proc/cpid1/uid_map:\n");
> +		printf("unexpected: idinsidens=%d idoutsidens=%d\n",
> +			idinsidens, idoutsidens);
> +		exit_val = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (setgroups == 0) {
> +		sprintf(cpid1gidpath, "/proc/%d/gid_map", cpid1);
> +		SAFE_FILE_SCANF(NULL, "/proc/self/gid_map", "%d %d %d",
> +			 &idinsidens, &idoutsidens, &length);
> +
> +		if (idinsidens != CHILD2GID || idoutsidens != parentgid) {
> +			printf("child_fn2 checks /proc/cpid2/gid_map:\n");
> +			printf("unexpected: idinsidens=%d idoutsidens=%d\n",
> +				idinsidens, idoutsidens);
> +			exit_val = 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		SAFE_FILE_SCANF(NULL, cpid1gidpath, "%d %d %d", &idinsidens,
> +			&idoutsidens, &length);
> +
> +		if (idinsidens != CHILD1GID || idoutsidens != CHILD2GID) {
> +			printf("child_fn1 checks /proc/cpid1/gid_map:\n");
> +			printf("unexpected: idinsidens=%d idoutsidens=%d\n",
> +				idinsidens, idoutsidens);
> +			exit_val = 1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	TST_SAFE_CHECKPOINT_WAKE_AND_WAIT(NULL, 1);
> +	return exit_val;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	char read_buf[BUFSIZ];
> +
> +	check_newuser();
> +	tst_tmpdir();
> +	TST_CHECKPOINT_INIT(NULL);
> +	if (tst_kvercmp(3, 19, 0) >= 0) {

I'm thinking if we shouldn't replace kernel version check with check that
"/proc/self/setgroups" exists. Then it would work on kernels that backport
those patches. What do you think?

> +		SAFE_FILE_SCANF(NULL, "/proc/self/setgroups", "%s", read_buf);
> +		if (strcmp(read_buf, "deny") == 0)
> +			setgroups = 0;
> +		else
> +			setgroups = 1;

You could drop one of these branches, static variable already defaults to 0.

> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	tst_rmdir();
> +}
> +
> +/*type: 0->uid; 1->git */

typo here, git -> gid

I'd suggest a define for these, it would be easier to read something like
UID_MAP, GID_MAP instead of 0 and 1.

> +static int updatemap(int cpid, bool type, int idnum, int parentmappid)
> +{
> +	char path[BUFSIZ];
> +	char content[BUFSIZ];
> +	int fd;
> +
> +	if (type == 0)
> +		sprintf(path, "/proc/%d/uid_map", cpid);
> +	else if (type == 1)
> +		sprintf(path, "/proc/%d/gid_map", cpid);
> +	else
> +		tst_brkm(TFAIL, NULL, "invalid type parameter");
> +
> +	sprintf(content, "%d %d 1", idnum, parentmappid);
> +	fd = SAFE_OPEN(NULL, path, O_WRONLY, 0644);
> +	SAFE_WRITE(NULL, 1, fd, content, strlen(content));

You should pass cleanup to SAFE_ functions above.

You are leaking fd here. Try to run it as ./netns03 -i 10000 and you get
  errno=EMFILE(24): Too many open files

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +	pid_t cpid2;
> +	int cpid1status, cpid2status;
> +	int lc;
> +
> +	tst_parse_opts(argc, argv, NULL, NULL);
> +	setup();
> +
> +	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> +		tst_count = 0;
> +
> +		parentuid = geteuid();
> +		parentgid = getegid();
> +
> +		cpid1 = ltp_clone_quick(CLONE_NEWUSER | SIGCHLD,
> +			(void *)child_fn1, NULL);
> +		if (cpid1 < 0)
> +			tst_brkm(TFAIL | TERRNO, cleanup,
> +				"cpid1 clone failed");
> +
> +		cpid2 = ltp_clone_quick(CLONE_NEWUSER | SIGCHLD,
> +			(void *)child_fn2, NULL);
> +		if (cpid2 < 0)
> +			tst_brkm(TFAIL | TERRNO, cleanup,
> +				"cpid2 clone failed");
> +
> +		updatemap(cpid1, 0, CHILD1UID, parentuid);
> +		updatemap(cpid2, 0, CHILD2UID, parentuid);
> +
> +		if (setgroups == 0) {
> +			updatemap(cpid1, 1, CHILD1GID, parentuid);
> +			updatemap(cpid2, 1, CHILD2GID, parentuid);
> +		}
> +
> +		TST_SAFE_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(NULL, 0);
> +		TST_SAFE_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(NULL, 1);
> +		TST_SAFE_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(NULL, 0);
> +		TST_SAFE_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(NULL, 1);

cleanup here as well

> +
> +		if ((waitpid(cpid1, &cpid1status, 0) < 0) ||
> +			(waitpid(cpid2, &cpid2status, 0) < 0))
> +				tst_resm(TBROK, "parent: waitpid failed.");

tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, ...


> +
> +		if (WIFSIGNALED(cpid1status)) {
> +			tst_resm(TBROK, "child1 was killed with signal = %d",

tst_resm(TFAIL

> +				WTERMSIG(cpid1status));
> +		} else if (WIFEXITED(cpid1status) &&
> +			WEXITSTATUS(cpid1status) != 0) {
> +			tst_resm(TBROK, "child1 exited abnormally");

tst_resm(TFAIL

> +		}
> +
> +		if (WIFSIGNALED(cpid2status)) {
> +			tst_resm(TBROK, "child2 was killed with signal = %d",
> +				WTERMSIG(cpid2status));

tst_resm(TFAIL

> +		} else if (WIFEXITED(cpid2status) &&
> +			WEXITSTATUS(cpid2status) != 0) {
> +			tst_resm(TBROK, "child2 exited abnormally");

tst_resm(TFAIL

Regards,
Jan


> +		} else
> +			tst_resm(TPASS, "Uid and the gid are right.");
> +	}
> +	tst_exit();
> +}
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-11 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-09  9:01 [LTP] [PATCH V2] containers: new testcase userns03 Yuan Sun
2015-06-11 13:55 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2015-06-15  1:35   ` Yuan Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55799344.5090100@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=sunyuan3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.