From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ross Lagerwall Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Avoid tripping watchdog when constructing dom0 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:39:43 +0100 Message-ID: <5579ABBF.6090904@citrix.com> References: <1434027810-27194-1-git-send-email-ross.lagerwall@citrix.com> <5579B5E20200007800083B76@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5579B5E20200007800083B76@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper , Keir Fraser , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/11/2015 03:22 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 11.06.15 at 15:03, wrote: >> @@ -946,6 +948,8 @@ int __init construct_dom0( >> if ( (rc = elf_xen_parse(&elf, &parms)) != 0 ) >> goto out; >> >> + process_pending_softirqs(); > > For this one I'm not sure whether it shouldn't really go somewhere > inside the ELF parser, namely due to the printing of each of the > known ELF notes (which is a generally growing set). > Is there an easy way of doing this given that the ELF parser is shared with and used by the toolstack? -- Ross Lagerwall