Re: Submodules as first class citizens (was Re: Moving to subtrees for plugins?)

[Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>]

Am 11.06.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Phil Hord:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> wrote:
>> Am 07.06.2015 um 08:26 schrieb Stefan Beller:
>>>
>>> On 06.06.2015 12:53, Luca Milanesio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6 Jun 2015, at 18:49, Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, 2:58 AM lucamilanesio <luca.milanesio@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ideally, as a "git clone --recursive" already exists, I would like to
>>>>>> see a "git diff --recursive" that goes through the submodules as well
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something possibly to propose to the Git mailing list?
>>
>>
>> Such an option makes lots of sense to me (though "--recurse-submodules"
>> should be its name for consistency reasons). This could be an alias for
>> "--submodule=full", as the "--submodule" option controls the format of
>> submodule diffs.
>
> To me, --recurse-submodules means submodules are still not first-class
> citizens.  But let's put that aside for a moment; I don't care about
> the switch name too much as long as I can configure
> 'diff.recurse-submodules = true'.

After somebody implemented the 'full' mode for 'diff --submodule',
setting 'diff.submodule' to 'full' would make --recurse-submodules the
default for diff (unless recursing into the submodules is overridden
by either the global 'diff.ignoreSubmodules' or the per-submodule
'submodule.<name>.ignore' setting of course).

> [The following is rather long.  I'm sorry for that.  Feel free to look
> away when it gets too vague.]

Sorry, that was too long for todays git time budget ;-)