All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] nohz: Evaluate tick dependency once on context switch
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:46:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5579F3A5.7010103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434044168-23173-8-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

On 06/11/2015 01:36 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The tick dependency is evaluated on every irq. This is a batch of checks
> which determine whether it is safe to stop the tick or not. These checks
> are often split in many details: posix cpu timers, scheduler, sched clock,
> perf events. Each of which are made of smaller details: posix cpu
> timer involves checking process wide timers then thread wide timers. Perf
> involves checking freq events then more per cpu details.
> 
> Checking these details every time we update the full dynticks state
> bring avoidable overhead.
> 
> So lets evaluate these dependencies once on context switch. Then the
> further dependency checks will be performed through a single state check.
> 
> This is a first step that can be later optimized by dividing task level
> dependency, CPU level dependency and global dependency and update
> each at the right time.

> +static void tick_nohz_full_update_dependencies(void)
> +{
> +	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
> +
> +	if (!posix_cpu_timers_can_stop_tick(current))
> +		ts->tick_needed |= TICK_NEEDED_POSIX_CPU_TIMER;
> +
> +	if (!perf_event_can_stop_tick())
> +		ts->tick_needed |= TICK_NEEDED_PERF_EVENT;
> +
> +	if (!sched_can_stop_tick())
> +		ts->tick_needed |= TICK_NEEDED_SCHED;
>  

I see this getting kicked from task work and from ipi
context, but does it get kicked on task wakeup, when
we have a second runnable task on a CPU, but we decide
not to preempt the currently running task to switch to
it yet, but we will want to preempt the currently running
task at a later point in time?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-11 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11 17:36 [PATCH 0/8] tick/nohz: Tick dependency quick check + cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] jiffies: Remove HZ > USEC_PER_SEC special case Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 20:46   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] apm32: Fix cputime == jiffies assumption Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 20:47   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] alpha: Fix jiffies based cputime assumption Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 20:47   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] nohz: Remove idle task special case Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 20:47   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-14  1:44   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-07-07 14:45     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] nohz: Restart the tick from irq exit Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 20:48   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-12  7:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-12 12:38     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-12 12:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-12 13:06         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-14  9:30       ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-07-07 14:23         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-14  9:18   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-14  9:19   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-07-07 14:20     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] nohz: Move tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick() above its users Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 20:48   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] nohz: Evaluate tick dependency once on context switch Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 20:46   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-06-17  5:59     ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-07-07 14:30     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-12  7:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-06 16:14     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] nohz: Remove useless argument on tick_nohz_task_switch() Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5579F3A5.7010103@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.