From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: Bucket name restrictions in RGW Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 20:44:05 +0200 Message-ID: <557B2875.1090505@42on.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from websrv.42on.com ([31.25.102.167]:46341 "EHLO websrv.42on.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755681AbbFLSoI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:44:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Harshal Gupta , ceph-devel On 06/12/2015 05:28 PM, Harshal Gupta wrote: > Hi, > I was looking into the bucket creation and found out that we are able > to create buckets with names which are not DNS compliant. One such > example is names ending with a non-alphanumeric character. There are > other rules which make bucket name restrictions in RGW more lenient > than what is recommended for DNS compliant names as well. > > In case we plan to support website hosting in future on RGW, we will > need to make bucket names DNS compliant. Keeping that in mind, I am > thinking about modifying the bucket name rules and applying more > restrictions to make them more towards DNS compliant. > > Please share your opinion about this. > I'm in favor. I would even like more strict bucket names, eg a setting where you can force all names to lowercase or refuse names with uppercase in it. This sometimes gives conflicts with DNS names when using lower and uppercase mixed. > Thanks, > Harshal Gupta > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Wido den Hollander 42on B.V. Ceph trainer and consultant Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902 Skype: contact42on