From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Wang Subject: Re: Rados multi-object transaction use cases Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:42:25 +0800 Message-ID: <557B9891.7040706@ubuntukylin.com> References: <1235935092.20915764.1434147302334.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from m199-177.yeah.net ([123.58.177.199]:33224 "EHLO m199-177.yeah.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753668AbbFMCmd (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2015 22:42:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1235935092.20915764.1434147302334.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just , ceph-devel Hi Samuel, We have made significant progress towards this implementation, we submitted a BP at http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Rados_-_multi-object_transaction_support several days ago, so far it is just a place holder, I will post our detailed progress soon, and great to hear your comments. Cheers, Li Wang On 2015/6/13 10:06, Samuel Just wrote: > In the Infernalis CDS, we had a session on RADOS multi-object transactions. I'd like to continue the discussion at the upcoming Jewel CDS. I thought I'd prime the discussion by asking: if librados supported multi-object read and write transactions, what would you use them for? Some idea of use cases would be valuable when considering things like deadlock coping strategies. > -Sam > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >