From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Please help triage these old backports Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:58:51 +0200 Message-ID: <557EAFEB.6000809@dachary.org> References: <557E9C37.809@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xkNjKx6TxJfdiAvFMrnK11htIri2H7u4D" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:34067 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753933AbbFOK6z (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 06:58:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <557E9C37.809@suse.cz> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nathan Cutler Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xkNjKx6TxJfdiAvFMrnK11htIri2H7u4D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [adding ceph-devel for other backporters benefit] Hi Nathan, On 15/06/2015 11:34, Nathan Cutler wrote: > Hi Loic: >=20 > I went over the list of old untriaged backports at >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?utf8=3D%E2%9C%93&set_filte= r=3D1&f[]=3Dstatus_id&op[status_id]=3D%3D&v[status_id][]=3D14&f[]=3Dcf_2&= op[cf_2]=3D!*&f[]=3D&c[]=3Dproject&c[]=3Dtracker&c[]=3Dstatus&c[]=3Dprior= ity&c[]=3Dsubject&c[]=3Dassigned_to&c[]=3Dupdated_on&c[]=3Dcategory&c[]=3D= fixed_version&c[]=3Dcf_3&group_by=3D >=20 > and processed those that I could figure out. There are four remaining > issues there - can you take a look? >=20 I triaged three of them. The fourth was about krbd which has an entirely = different lifecycle. I think we can assume the meaning of "Pending Backpo= rt" for the project http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-kclient is diff= erent from what we have at http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases= =2E I've updated http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWT= O_triage_incoming_Pending_backport_issues with the following request inst= ead of collecting all "Pending Backport" issues from all projects regardl= ess. http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?utf8=3D%E2%9C%93&set_filter=3D= 1&f[]=3Dstatus_id&op[status_id]=3D%3D&v[status_id][]=3D14&f[]=3Dcf_2&op[c= f_2]=3D!*&f[]=3Dsubproject_id&op[subproject_id]=3D%3D&v[subproject_id][]=3D= 8&v[subproject_id][]=3D13&v[subproject_id][]=3D9&v[subproject_id][]=3D10&= v[subproject_id][]=3D14&f[]=3D&c[]=3Dproject&c[]=3Dtracker&c[]=3Dstatus&c= []=3Dpriority&c[]=3Dsubject&c[]=3Dassigned_to&c[]=3Dupdated_on&c[]=3Dcate= gory&c[]=3Dfixed_version&c[]=3Dcf_3&group_by=3D Do you see an problem with that ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --xkNjKx6TxJfdiAvFMrnK11htIri2H7u4D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlV+r+sACgkQ8dLMyEl6F231+QCeKrx6v25kYU9cCfhxMIpgkkB5 kHEAn0QutEY65t+Xm2OFuEaEpXpQP5lm =vR7q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xkNjKx6TxJfdiAvFMrnK11htIri2H7u4D--