From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Subject: Re: Move RBD Cache on clients from RAM to SSD. Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:55:30 +0300 Message-ID: <55800EB2.3040200@gmail.com> References: <557FD76C.9070905@gmail.com> <9F993C58-6380-4132-A87F-850A84A397DB@redhat.com> <55800BC5.7020200@gmail.com> <55800CD0.1060003@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:33793 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756284AbbFPLze (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:55:34 -0400 Received: by lbbti3 with SMTP id ti3so9165753lbb.1 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 04:55:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55800CD0.1060003@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Nelson , Sebastien Han Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" 16.06.2015 14:47, Mark Nelson =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > As an alternative, would dm-cache or bcache on the client VM be an op= tion? >=20 > Mark I not think it's working witch librbd in usecase with libvirt. This solution working with kernel rbd module when you can associate rbd bloc= k device with bcache device. I think so. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html