From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] sched:Consider imbalance_pct when comparing loads in numa_has_capacity
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:39:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55803511.1060601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434455762-30857-3-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 06/16/2015 07:56 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> This is consistent with all other load balancing instances where we
> absorb unfairness upto env->imbalance_pct. Absorbing unfairness upto
> env->imbalance_pct allows to pull and retain task to their preferred
> nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
How does this work with other workloads, eg.
single instance SPECjbb2005, or two SPECjbb2005
instances on a four node system?
Is the load still balanced evenly between nodes
with this patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 11:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] Improve numa load balancing Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/tip:Prefer numa hotness over cache hotness Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-06 15:50 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Prefer NUMA " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 0:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-08 13:31 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 6:49 ` tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched:Consider imbalance_pct when comparing loads in numa_has_capacity Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 14:39 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-06-22 16:29 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-23 1:18 ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-23 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-23 13:01 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-23 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-06 15:50 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Consider 'imbalance_pct' when comparing loads in numa_has_capacity() tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 6:49 ` tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched:Fix task_numa_migrate to always update preferred node Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 14:54 ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 17:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 18:25 ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 17:18 ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched:Use correct nid while evaluating task weights Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 15:00 ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 17:26 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55803511.1060601@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.