From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: Checking on wip-blkin branch Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:13:49 -0700 Message-ID: <5580594D.8040809@redhat.com> References: <5576FBEA.8030805@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43127 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754805AbbFPRNq (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:13:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Xue, Chendi" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Shewmaker On 06/16/2015 12:02 AM, Xue, Chendi wrote: > HI, Josh and Andrew > > I just rebase the wip-blkin branch to 9.0.1, and did a rados bench test on that > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4963 Thanks! Reset the branch in ceph.git. > Lttng result is collected successfully > > Considering on rados testsuits failing issues, I don't have a test environment, any suggests? You should be able to reproduce the failures without teuthology. Try running these scripts from the ceph tree with ms inject socket failures = 5000 in the [global] section of ceph.conf: qa/workunits/rados/test.sh qa/workunits/rados/test_pool_quota.sh qa/workunits/rados/cls.sh These resulted in osd crashes in the last rados suite run linked earlier in the thread. Josh > Best Regards, > -Chendi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Durgin [mailto:jdurgin@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 10:45 PM > To: Xue, Chendi; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Shewmaker > Subject: Re: Checking on wip-blkin branch > > Hi Chendi, > > On 06/09/2015 04:59 AM, Xue, Chendi wrote: >> Hi, Josh and Andrew >> >> Today, I applied wip-blkin branch to my 4 nodes ceph setup, and created zipkin-based lttng results successfully. >> >> Since we wanna using this latency analyzing methodology on further release or on keyvalue store and newstore. >> I am wondering what is the gap to merge blkin into master? Can I help to rebase to master, so we can merge this branch? > > That'd be great! Andrew and I simply haven't had time to finish fixing up the remaining issues. Running it through a rados suite showed some more changes were necessary to handle more complicated osd usage - you'll see several osd crashes in this rados suite run [1]. > > The code was looking fine to me, it just needs rebasing and debugging so it can pass the rados test suite. > > Thanks! > Josh > > [1] > http://pulpito.ceph.com/joshd-2015-03-25_17:29:16-rados-wip-blkin---blkin-multi/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >