From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: Checking on wip-blkin branch Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:20:24 -0700 Message-ID: <558068E8.3050305@redhat.com> References: <5576FBEA.8030805@redhat.com> <5580594D.8040809@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50830 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752728AbbFPSUU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:20:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5580594D.8040809@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Xue, Chendi" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Shewmaker On 06/16/2015 10:13 AM, Josh Durgin wrote: > On 06/16/2015 12:02 AM, Xue, Chendi wrote: >> HI, Josh and Andrew >> >> I just rebase the wip-blkin branch to 9.0.1, and did a rados bench >> test on that >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4963 > > Thanks! Reset the branch in ceph.git. > >> Lttng result is collected successfully >> >> Considering on rados testsuits failing issues, I don't have a test >> environment, any suggests? > > You should be able to reproduce the failures without teuthology. Try > running these scripts from the ceph tree with > > ms inject socket failures = 5000 > > in the [global] section of ceph.conf: > > qa/workunits/rados/test.sh > qa/workunits/rados/test_pool_quota.sh > qa/workunits/rados/cls.sh Whoops, there's no cls.sh. I meant all the scripts in qa/workunits/cls/ > > These resulted in osd crashes in the last rados suite run linked > earlier in the thread. > > Josh > >> Best Regards, >> -Chendi >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Josh Durgin [mailto:jdurgin@redhat.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 10:45 PM >> To: Xue, Chendi; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Shewmaker >> Subject: Re: Checking on wip-blkin branch >> >> Hi Chendi, >> >> On 06/09/2015 04:59 AM, Xue, Chendi wrote: >>> Hi, Josh and Andrew >>> >>> Today, I applied wip-blkin branch to my 4 nodes ceph setup, and >>> created zipkin-based lttng results successfully. >>> >>> Since we wanna using this latency analyzing methodology on further >>> release or on keyvalue store and newstore. >>> I am wondering what is the gap to merge blkin into master? Can I help >>> to rebase to master, so we can merge this branch? >> >> That'd be great! Andrew and I simply haven't had time to finish fixing >> up the remaining issues. Running it through a rados suite showed some >> more changes were necessary to handle more complicated osd usage - >> you'll see several osd crashes in this rados suite run [1]. >> >> The code was looking fine to me, it just needs rebasing and debugging >> so it can pass the rados test suite. >> >> Thanks! >> Josh >> >> [1] >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/joshd-2015-03-25_17:29:16-rados-wip-blkin---blkin-multi/ >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html