From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suspicious RCU usage at boot w/ arm ipi trace events?
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:49:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558223B2.5030204@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150617044643.GW3913@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 06/16/2015 09:46 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 05:41:29PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> The tracepoint 'trace_ipi_entry' in handle_IPI() is using RCU and we
>> haven't called irq_enter() yet at the point. Does this tracepoint need
>> to have _rcuidle() added to it?
> Yes, I believe that would fix this problem.
>
Ok... here's the patch. I see the problem on my device and applying this
patch fixes it.
----8<----
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Silence suspicious RCU usage with ipi tracepoints
John Stultz reports an RCU splat on boot with ARM ipi trace
events enabled.
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.1.0-rc7-00033-gb5bed2f #153 Not tainted
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/ipi.h:68 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
no locks held by swapper/0/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7-00033-gb5bed2f #153
Hardware name: Qualcomm (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c0216b08>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c02136e8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c02136e8>] (show_stack) from [<c075e678>] (dump_stack+0x70/0xbc)
[<c075e678>] (dump_stack) from [<c0215a80>] (handle_IPI+0x428/0x604)
[<c0215a80>] (handle_IPI) from [<c020942c>] (gic_handle_irq+0x54/0x5c)
[<c020942c>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0766604>] (__irq_svc+0x44/0x7c)
Exception stack(0xc09f3f48 to 0xc09f3f90)
3f40: 00000001 00000001 00000000 c09f73b8 c09f4528 c0a5de9c
3f60: c076b4f0 00000000 00000000 c09ef108 c0a5cec1 00000001 00000000 c09f3f90
3f80: c026bf60 c0210ab8 20000113 ffffffff
[<c0766604>] (__irq_svc) from [<c0210ab8>] (arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c)
[<c0210ab8>] (arch_cpu_idle) from [<c02647f0>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x2c0/0x5dc)
[<c02647f0>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c099bc1c>] (start_kernel+0x358/0x3c4)
[<c099bc1c>] (start_kernel) from [<8020807c>] (0x8020807c)
At this point in the IPI handling path we haven't called
irq_enter() yet, so RCU doesn't know that we're about to exit
idle and properly warns that we're using RCU from an idle CPU.
Use trace_ipi_entry_rcuidle() instead of trace_ipi_entry() so
that RCU is informed about our exit from idle.
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Fixes: 365ec7b17327 "ARM: add IPI tracepoints"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
index 13a91d390832..03eb8a446dca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ void handle_IPI(int ipinr, struct pt_regs *regs)
struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
if ((unsigned)ipinr < NR_IPI) {
- trace_ipi_entry(ipi_types[ipinr]);
+ trace_ipi_entry_rcuidle(ipi_types[ipinr]);
__inc_irq_stat(cpu, ipi_irqs[ipinr]);
}
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ void handle_IPI(int ipinr, struct pt_regs *regs)
}
if ((unsigned)ipinr < NR_IPI)
- trace_ipi_exit(ipi_types[ipinr]);
+ trace_ipi_exit_rcuidle(ipi_types[ipinr]);
set_irq_regs(old_regs);
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-18 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-17 0:21 Suspicious RCU usage at boot w/ arm ipi trace events? John Stultz
2015-06-17 0:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-17 0:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-06-17 4:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-18 1:49 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-06-18 2:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-18 3:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-18 21:57 ` John Stultz
2015-06-19 18:49 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558223B2.5030204@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.