diff for duplicates of <558236C2.9030009@gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 9b25e14..5542668 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 
 
-On 2015-06-17 02:58 PM, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:
+On 2015-06-17 02:58 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
 > On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 12:21PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
 >>
 >>
->> On June 17, 2015 12:07:30 PM EDT, "S?ren Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
+>> On June 17, 2015 12:07:30 PM EDT, "Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
 >>> On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 11:52AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
 >>>> This removes the unused variable num_frag and the setting of it
 >>>> to the number of fragments from the passed sk_buff pointer by
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ On 2015-06-17 02:58 PM, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:
 >>> It's used right here, isn't it (and further down in this function too)?
 >>> Does your tree compile with this change?
 >>>
->>> 	S?ren
+>>> 	Sören
 >> My tree does compile with this change. 
 > 
 > You have to fix your testing process:
@@ -72,7 +72,12 @@ On 2015-06-17 02:58 PM, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:
 > 
 > NACK for the patch.
 > 
-> 	S?ren
+> 	Sören
 > 
 Sorry about that as I tried again and it didn't build. Weird issue maybe something with ccache.
 Nick
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index d30f287..0356667 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,19 +2,25 @@
  "ref\020150617160730.GE2906@xsjsorenbubuntu\0"
  "ref\0DD47523D-0DF9-46B5-9382-3C30BBD9E815@gmail.com\0"
  "ref\020150617185848.GI2906@xsjsorenbubuntu\0"
- "From\0xerofoify@gmail.com (nick)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH] xilinx:Remove unused variable num_frag in the function axienet_start_xmit\0"
+ "From\0nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] xilinx:Remove unused variable num_frag in the function axienet_start_xmit\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:10:58 -0400\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0S\303\266ren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0netdev@vger.kernel.org"
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  michal.simek@xilinx.com
+  anirudh@xilinx.com
+  John.Linn@xilinx.com
+ " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "\n"
  "\n"
- "On 2015-06-17 02:58 PM, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:\n"
+ "On 2015-06-17 02:58 PM, S\303\266ren Brinkmann wrote:\n"
  "> On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 12:21PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">>\n"
- ">> On June 17, 2015 12:07:30 PM EDT, \"S?ren Brinkmann\" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:\n"
+ ">> On June 17, 2015 12:07:30 PM EDT, \"S\303\266ren Brinkmann\" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:\n"
  ">>> On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 11:52AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:\n"
  ">>>> This removes the unused variable num_frag and the setting of it\n"
  ">>>> to the number of fragments from the passed sk_buff pointer by\n"
@@ -55,7 +61,7 @@
  ">>> It's used right here, isn't it (and further down in this function too)?\n"
  ">>> Does your tree compile with this change?\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> \tS?ren\n"
+ ">>> \tS\303\266ren\n"
  ">> My tree does compile with this change. \n"
  "> \n"
  "> You have to fix your testing process:\n"
@@ -82,9 +88,14 @@
  "> \n"
  "> NACK for the patch.\n"
  "> \n"
- "> \tS?ren\n"
+ "> \tS\303\266ren\n"
  "> \n"
  "Sorry about that as I tried again and it didn't build. Weird issue maybe something with ccache.\n"
- Nick
+ "Nick\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-20cd03670c32021de2c77933f4607d4ef5f8ed1951a83d79e5b5cacfdda45a4e
+5e5bb4ceaec2dbbf7f51d6c85644cbe93d2035a2ec5c7c8d37ef313495e98a22
