All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, rshearma@brocade.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 2/3] ipv4: add support for light weight tunnel encap attributes
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 19:30:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55877360.609@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150621202017.GA4228@pox.localdomain>

On 6/21/15, 1:20 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 06/18/15 at 09:49pm, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> Introduces two netlink attributes RTA_ENCAP_TYPE and
>> RTA_ENCAP to support attaching encap information to ipv4 routes.
>>
>> RTA_ENCAP is a nested attribute as suggested by Thomas
>> (and also as Robert had it in his series). RTA_ENCAP
>> netlink policy is declared by the light weight tunnel
>> drivers that support this encap type.
>>
>> fib code calls the following for each nexthop:
>> 	- new route handler:
>> 		lwt build state (that parses RTA_ENCAP and returns
>> 	  	lwt state that lives in every fib_nh)
>> 	- del dump hanlder:
>> 		lwt release handler to release lwt state data
>> 	- route dump hanlder:
>> 		lwt dump encap to fill RTA_ENCAP data
>> 	- during input route lookup
>> 		sets dst->output to lwtunnel_output which
>> 		in turn calls the corresponding lwt tunnel
>> 		output function which applies the required
>> 		encap and xmits the packet
> Thanks for putting in the flag! I think introducing helpers for the
> lwt work would help as it can centralize the required ifdef magic
> and be defined as a static inline nop or macros so the core routing
> code doesn't need to have ifdefs spread around.
yes that would be better, let me see what I can do.

thanks,

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-22  2:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-19  4:49 [PATCH net-next RFC v2 2/3] ipv4: add support for light weight tunnel encap attributes Roopa Prabhu
2015-06-19  6:59 ` Julian Anastasov
2015-06-19 14:19   ` roopa
2015-06-19 14:55     ` Robert Shearman
2015-06-19 15:15       ` roopa
2015-06-19 15:19 ` Robert Shearman
2015-06-19 15:28   ` roopa
2015-06-19 17:17     ` Robert Shearman
2015-06-19 18:42       ` roopa
2015-06-21 20:20 ` Thomas Graf
2015-06-22  2:30   ` roopa [this message]
2015-07-03 10:00 ` Summary lightweight tunnel discussion at NFWS Thomas Graf
2015-07-05  6:21   ` roopa
2015-07-06 13:03     ` Thomas Graf
2015-07-06 15:24       ` roopa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55877360.609@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --to=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rshearma@brocade.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.