From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 35DD4E00978; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:33:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D844BE00957 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9B796003B3B; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:33:46 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1434972826; bh=92S3sYIjA9RWPfE41zID+jH9nSaoJn8czF+Z2jQl2/w=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mo9WhFyK0ZMHZ/IWIMHDwcUcleWEGn4a9bsUIcp9Zs+BDDe5A1u+lrRKM2TK+hBut bsAdrKECx98gMwsLqczLBzKjf5mlDormC+XGE3tkcMdlW1c+xz+n56+d/rcZXADJK0 udhGYDcG1rJnYk++m8pT82/z/LY6o6uR2Dm6gqhE= Message-ID: <5587F29A.6080909@mail.bg> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:33:46 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?R3nDtnJneSBLw7Z2ZXNkaQ==?= , meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: <20150621183207.0f614fb8@kgy-pc.lan> <5587C667.10701@teledigit.eu> <5587EEB0.50008@teledigit.eu> In-Reply-To: <5587EEB0.50008@teledigit.eu> Subject: Re: Error compiling barebox on fido X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:33:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi György, On 06/22/2015 02:17 PM, György Kövesdi wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to switch back to gcc 4.8 on fido, but the same error occurs. > Is the gcc built differently on fido? [snip] Well, there's no "-nostdinc" directive, so these include paths should be there. Also, in the devtools recipe gcc-4.9 seems to be compiled with proper include paths. I think there could be an issue with your recipe, as I can build custom components that uses stdio.h on Fido without such errors. Also, there a quite a lot of components that include the same header and seem to build again without issues (alsa, pulseaudio, xz and others). Can you please verify this issue on a clean Fido, that wasn't modified in any way, and with a very simple recipe? Regards, Nikolay