From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7NoB-00004z-UW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:00:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7No6-0000Cn-0s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:00:11 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49393 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7No5-0000BB-QP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:00:05 -0400 Message-ID: <55895854.3000101@suse.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:00:04 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55631EC5.9030909@redhat.com> <55640E70.1080306@suse.de> <55642961.2080409@redhat.com> <55642CE6.6040004@suse.de> <55642E04.6060902@redhat.com> <55642F4F.20707@suse.de> <55642FEA.6020006@suse.de> <55645DE4.5000803@redhat.com> <20150529183443.GA28770@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] More core code ENV_GET_CPU removals List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , Peter Crosthwaite , Juan Quintela , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Alexander Graf , Peter Crosthwaite , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson Hi Peter, Am 04.06.2015 um 03:10 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite: > Was there an outcome? The conclusion for this series was that I would get a chance to review it (which I did later than I wanted to, after my talks from a hotel...) and that future patch series should spend a certain minimum time on the list, either before or after being applied by a maintainer but before being included in a PULL. The idea is to assure a) general review opportunity for both affected and non-affected non-maintainers and b) opportunity to react to maintainer's oversights before they become facts in Git history. Differences of opinion still exist in what commitment to and extend of patch review we expect before patches get applied, and to what degree code/commit conventions vary from maintainer to maintainer or subsystem to subsystem. Am I seeing correctly that no respin or follow-up happened yet after I reviewed it? Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; = HRB 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg)