From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] x86/pvh: Properly set HYPERVISOR_COMPAT_VIRT_START for PVH guests Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 22:55:53 -0400 Message-ID: <558A1C39.9090006@oracle.com> References: <1434769773-5157-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <1434769773-5157-7-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <55897A70020000780008853A@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55897A70020000780008853A@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com, Keir Fraser , Andrew Cooper , tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, roger.pau@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/23/2015 09:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 20.06.15 at 05:09, wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c >> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, unsigned int >> domcr_flags, >> mapcache_domain_init(d); >> >> HYPERVISOR_COMPAT_VIRT_START(d) = >> - is_pv_domain(d) ? __HYPERVISOR_COMPAT_VIRT_START : ~0u; >> + is_hvm_domain(d) ? ~0u : __HYPERVISOR_COMPAT_VIRT_START; > Why would a PVH domain be different in this respect from a HVM one? > No reason indeed. I somehow thought that layout should be similar to PV, which it doesn't need to be. So this patch should be dropped. -boris