All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"x86 @ kernel . org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugfix v2] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32bit kernel
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:00:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558A8DBC.3010709@pr.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558A698A.9000508@pr.hu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 776 bytes --]

2015-06-24 10:25 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
> 2015-06-24 09:43 keltezéssel, Jiang Liu írta:
>> Hi Zoltan,
>> 	Could you please help to test this patch against the latest kernel?
>> Thanks!
>> Gerry
> I will, thanks.

Now i have tested this v2. I assume later ones will only differ in the commit message.
It works, thank you very much!

There are differences now between lspci between 3.18.16 and 4.1.0-final plus
this patch but I guess they are not relevant to this matter. The i915 chip and
the Realtek chip have their IRQs reversed and the "Data: " part in the
"Address:" line, too. I attached the lspci -vvxxx output from 3.18.16, 4.1-rc8
with the very first patch and 4.1-final with the v2 patch, so you can see if it is
an error or not.

Best regards,
Zoltán


[-- Attachment #2: lspci2.tgz --]
[-- Type: application/x-compressed-tar, Size: 12285 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-24 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-24  7:43 [Bugfix v2] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32bit kernel Jiang Liu
2015-06-24  8:25 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-24 11:00   ` Boszormenyi Zoltan [this message]
2015-06-24  8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24  9:28   ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-24  9:28     ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-24  9:49     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 10:17       ` [Bugfix v3] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel Jiang Liu
2015-06-24 10:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-29  8:55           ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-29 14:28             ` Jiang Liu
2015-06-29 14:28               ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-08  7:26             ` [Bugfix v4] " Jiang Liu
2015-07-10  1:10               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-02 15:27               ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-11-05 12:53                 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-11-05 13:24                   ` Jiang Liu
2015-11-05 13:53                     ` Tomasz Nowicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=558A8DBC.3010709@pr.hu \
    --to=zboszor@pr.hu \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.