From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z81rh-00034M-Og for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:46:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z81ra-0006PS-O4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:46:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:37915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z81ra-0006PJ-Hj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:46:22 -0400 Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so67423150wib.1 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <558BB1CA.3030006@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:46:18 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1435163110-2724-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1435163110-2724-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20150625034457.GH17695@ad.nay.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150625034457.GH17695@ad.nay.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] memory: Add global-locking property to memory regions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Frederic Konrad On 25/06/2015 05:44, Fam Zheng wrote: >> > + * memory_region_clear_global_locking: Declares that access processing does >> > + * not depend on the QEMU global lock. >> > + * >> > + * By clearing this property, accesses to the memory region will be processed > Inconsistent with singlar form (access) in the previous one. Otherwise, I think this is correct English actually. "Access processing" in the first line cannot use a plural because it behaves as a single word. Let's ask a native speaker. :) Paolo